No. The Anti-Cybercrime Law does not stipulate that intentionality is a general explicit condition in all cybercrimes.

“Any act committed that involves the use of a computer or information network in violation of the provisions of this system.”

“A person intentionally accessing a computer, website, information system, or computer network to which that person is not authorized.”

Accordingly, intentionality is an explicit part of the concept of illegal entry; therefore, it falls within the forms of criminalization based on this concept, including:

  • Unlawful access to threats or blackmail, or to a website, mentioned in Article 3.
  • Illegal entry to cancel, delete, destroy, leak or alter data, as set out in Article 5.
  • Illegal entry to obtain data that affects the internal or external security of the State or its national economy, as mentioned in Article 7.

As for other acts listed in Articles 3, 4, 5, and 6, such as eavesdropping, capturing, defaming, defrauding, seizing, disrupting the network, or producing or publishing prohibited content, their texts do not include intentional language as a general, unified condition.

For law and legal consultations..Contact the office of lawyer Abdul Majeed Al Rashid.

References

  • Article 1 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law
  • Article 3 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law
  • Article Four of the Anti-Cybercrime Law
  • Article Five of the Anti-Cybercrime Law
  • Article 6 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law
  • Article Seven of the Anti-Cybercrime Law

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *